Haw’s “Brooklyn Bridge” and Whitman’s “Crossing Brooklyn Ferry”

Walt Whitman was certainly a poet of the people!  Beal’s lifeless city view (discussed by Haw) was an urban self-image, but lifeless, without evidence of or desire to include workers,  materials, or ugliness. On the other hand, Whitman’s view of the river and its surroundings include the bustling of the people. The place, the view, and the river, all belong to the people, people now, and “so many hundred years hence.”  I enjoyed, too, the way Whitman sees beauty and significance in just about everything, for he even finds the ordinary or ugly worthy of inclusion. For example, in #3 he refers to the floating and glistening seagulls, then moves on to the schooners and steamers, including the flags they carry. Surprisingly, even the “fires from the foundry chimneys” are treated as worthy of attention, “casting their flicker of black contrasted with wild red and yellow light over the tops of houses, and down into the clefts of streets.” Whitman owns it! And he seems to proclaim that it is all good, it is all parts of the whole, and available to all, past, present, and future.

Susan McClung, Tampa

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s